Diagnosing Your Community Before You Plan
|
Read the start of article:
"Prepare a comprehensive plan" is often the prescription
planners suggest to solve the difficult development,
conservation, and related problems that confront their
community. But does it always make sense to undertake an
exhaustive multi-year planning process that can cost tens of
thousands of dollars or more, and may not even resolve the
critical issues currently facing the community?
A useful first step -- before preparing a comprehensive plan --
may be to conduct a community "diagnostic study." It costs far
less, can be completed in a fairly short time, and can help get
a handle on the community's "hot button" issues. In addition,
the diagnostic study will focus your comprehensive plan work
when and if it is necessary.
A Typical Scenario
The value of conducting an initial diagnostic study can be more
easily understood by setting out the following scenario:
The Town of Exurbia, which has experienced only modest growth in
the past thirty years, suddenly finds itself besieged with
development applications. These projects, if built, will double
the population in the next five or ten years and consume an area
four times as large as the existing developed area of the town.
The proposed development consists primarily of cul-de-sac
subdivisions and strip commercial development.
The town is split politically between those who want to slow or
stop growth and those who want to cash in on it. Since the
current zoning allows most of this development (although it is
inconsistent with the town's current master plan), there appears
to be very little that the planning commission can do about
these proposals, other than to approve them.
What should the planning commission do?
The Typical Response:
The all-too-common response is to begin preparing a
comprehensive plan. Yet by the time the comprehensive planning
process is finished and it is time to write ordinances, many of
the development projects (which triggered the call for better
planning in the first place) will have already been approved,
and the planning process will seem irrelevant. And by the time
the municipality has paid for the comprehensive plan, it may
have little or no funding left over to write new ordinances.
Some municipalities deal with this problem with a stop-gap
development moratorium, which is at best only a partial solution
and often exacerbates the polarization that already exists in
the community.
Comprehensive plans also typically leave municipal officials
with a laundry list of actions to perform and little sense of
priority about what to do next. In addition, comprehensive
plans, in an effort to achieve a fragile consensus, often avoid
dealing directly with the most critical issues and public
concerns.
Moreover, if the state calls for municipalities to redo their
plans every five years (as a growing number of states require),
many communities end up having to revise their plan before they
have implemented it. And guess what? The plans never get
implemented and planning looks to the ordinary citizen like an
exercise in futility.
Because "the devil is in the details," drafting ordinances is
almost always much more complicated and time-consuming than
writing and adopting a plan. I am continually amazed at how many
municipalities have done elaborate comprehensive plans and how
few have effectively implemented them through zoning and public
investments. The reason, I believe, is failure to diagnose the
social and human issues that underlie the community's planning
problems.
The bottom line for a town like Exurbia is that its considerable
investment in time and money in preparing a comprehensive plan
may well have a very limited payoff in resolving its pressing
problem of how to deal with a rapid increase in development.
... [article then focuses on the function of a "diagnostic study" and how it can be prepared] The full article can be ordered & downloaded. Click lightning bolt icon at top left. |