Bringing Commercial Uses Closer to Existing Residential Neighborhoods, Part II

April 4th, 2013

Read the start of this article below; to view full article you need to be a PlannersWeb member. Already a member? -- be sure you're logged-in. Not a member? Consider joining the PlannersWeb.

photo of Winter Park, Florida, main street
Commercial uses can best mesh with adjoining residential neighborhoods when they are have attractive streetscapes and are pedestrian-oriented.

In my last column, I wrote about concerns residents are likely to have when a commercial district is proposed for the edge of their neighborhood and offered some strategies for addressing those concerns.

In this column, I want to address development standards for these districts. While the job of putting together standards for neighborhood commercial districts will largely be in the hands of your staff planner, I thought it would be helpful to provide those of you who serve as planning commissioners (or interested citizens) an overview of the types of concerns often addressed in neighborhood commercial zoning districts.

Viewed at their broadest, regulations for neighborhood commercial districts should be designed to:

  • Create a pedestrian-oriented environment.
  • Mitigate negative off-site impacts from commercial establishments to the greatest extent feasible.
  • Provide for monitoring and enforcement of any potential negative off-site impacts.

Below are some specific components that are often considered as part of the district regulations. Note that not all the items identified below will be found in the land development code. Some may be in other parts of the city or county code and some may be in the form of policies and procedures.

1. Uses -- Provide certainty to neighbors by being specific in establishing appropriate uses. You can also list uses that are prohibited. For example, will restaurants with outdoor dining be permitted? Will outdoor entertainment be permitted? If so, will speaker systems be allowed?

2. Building design -- Consider how important it is to regulate the look of buildings. Architectural consistency with the neighborhood may be desirable, or it may be sufficient to address certain design aspects such as the location of the front entry, the amount of windows facing the street (and whether they can be tinted or frosted), and prohibited materials (e.g., metal) or colors.

3. Building scale and intensity -- Building height can be regulated by an absolute figure (e.g., 50 feet) or by proximity to other development (e.g., if adjoining one story residential, non-residential development may not exceed 40 feet). Where building lots are large enough, building heights can "step back" (i.e., building heights closer to residential lots are lower and heights closer to the commercial street are higher).

The overall mass of the building can be regulated by establishing a maximum floor area ratio. (Floor area ratio, or "FAR," is the ratio of building square foot to lot size. For example, a 20,000 square foot building on a 10,000 square foot lot has a floor area ratio of 2.0.) ...

End of excerpt from article

Wendy Grey, AICP, is principal of Wendy Grey Land Use Planning LLC which works with public, private, and non-profit clients on planning and land use issues. Prior to establishing her own firm in September 2002, Grey spent 20 years in the public sector dealing with development and growth management in Florida, including ten years as Planning Director for Tallahassee and Leon County.

Ediitor's Note: The Creekside Project

Ted Shekell (author of Talking Behind the Public's Back -- The Ex Parte Problem) is planning director for the City of O'Fallon, Illinois, a suburb of St. Louis. Ted relates one experience his community had with a commercial development proposed near a long-time residential neighborhood -- which didn't go as well as planners and the planning commission had hoped.

-- read Ted Shekell's comments about the Creekside Promenade project.

You must be logged in or a PlannersWeb member to read the rest of the article.